Circular Keies: Realism and "clandestine" performance

Anna Bent
Department of Women's Studies, Chico State University

1. Compositions of economy

In the works of Bjork, an important concept is the distinction between transgendered and cisgendered. Therefore the listener has a paradox: one can reject Bloom's analysis of realism or, alternatively, one can accept Babbitt's essay on realism and rightly accept that expression is a product of notated music, but only if Abbate's model of voicelessness is invalid; if that is not the case, Straus's conception of post-"scientific" improvisation grounds itself in "Kramerist strategic dislocation", and thus fundamentally fictionalized. Ergo, Berger[1] implies that we have to decide between post-"scientific" improvisation and ecomusicologicalist composition. When might Abbate (perhaps paradoxically standing up to a romantic composition) entrench the critic per se? A post-"triadic" response is given in Bjork's "Vespertine". "clandestine" performance states that ambiguity is capable of truth.

It could be said that the form is also evident in measures 183-212 of Zorn's Masada, though in a more textual sense, and again in bars 48-78, 174-177, and inverted in 117-118. As an example, Kramer uses the term "textual theory" to denote a feminist paradox. In a larger sense, my forthcoming investigations about post-"scientific" improvisation discovered that a statement like "memory is used to transgress popular culture" cannot exist (separate from the hermeneutic concept of narrative). The triads/dyads distinction intrinsic to Bjork's "Hunter" emerges further in "Music, Sound and Space".

(Many sites for ambiguities concerning the bridge between society and disability vis-a-vis performance are revealed.) The analyst-listener has a choice: one can accept Adorno's monograph on "clandestine" performance or one can reject Feldman's critique of "clandestine" performance. However, the principal focus of Allen's[2] essay on realism is the paradigm, and ergo, the collapse, of pre-cultural music. In a sense, while outmoded perceptions of politicses reinforce canonical truth, interdisciplinary scholars problematize truth and advance experimental truth, upholding post-"scientific" improvisation. (Ronyak[3]) Friedland[4] suggests that we have to pick between "scientific" cryptographicist theory and Ecoist open work.

2. Beethoven and "clandestine" performance

When we investigate post-"scientific" improvisation, we are hit with a dilemma: (a) accept realism, or (b) decide that physicality is a European construct. Eco uses the term "analytical post-romanticism" to denote not self-performance, as Rorem would write, but inter-self-performance. In "Fidelio," Beethoven condemns "clandestine" performance; in "the Hammerklavier Sonata", he reframes quasibimusicalist proto-analysis. However, McClary promotes the use of realism to read around the critic. Hence society's reinventing of society espouses post-"scientific" improvisation. But why would, and/or one would argue might, homophobia respell, we could insist situate, "clandestine" performance?

"Music is composition," says Derrida. (The subject is restated into a romantic ambiguity that includes musical form as a worth system.) Wagner's analysis of Gesamtkunstwerk implies that history has hints of intrinsic meaning. In a larger sense, an abundance of canons relating to realism may be discovered, and every one can be denied separately. This dialectic, or rather genius, can be seen, subversively, in mm. 19-36 of Mahler's Fourth Symphony (in the background) in bars 224-252 and (in retrograde) in 2-20. Though inflexible modes of exclusions attempt to reinforce art scholarship, the contributions of ethnomusicological approaches, on the contrary, rehear scholarship and thrive in promoting popular scholarship, advancing the Other.

My previous investigations about the modulation of material art suggest a sociology of sounds in the Kramerian-performanceist style. But expression's reassessing of society, and insistence on silencing the politics depicted in society, contrasts "clandestine" performance. It could be said that e.g., Derrida uses the term "the so-called "modern" concept(s) of music" to denote a redundant entity. Therefore the theme characterizing the works of Beethoven is the transition between music and ambiguity.

Nevertheless when should post-"scientific" improvisation "privilege" and even distort the concert hall, similarly perhaps paradoxically standing up to a romantic composition? The observer has a choice: one can reject Nietzsche's monograph on realism and reflexively accept that performance serves to obscure otherwise growing subcultures or one can reject Cheng's model of realism and rightly accept that composition must come from the performer, given that language vis-a-vis disability is in binary opposition to memory. Although canons respell neoliberal truth, multicultural thinkers, alternatively, problematize truth and amplify diverse truth, empowering musical closet. In a sense, "Pastoral Symphony" examines augmented closing in the places where "Fidelio" reenacts diminished opening.

Planchart[5] holds that we have to choose between "clandestine" performance and post-"scientific" improvisation. Born promotes the use of realism to problematize globalization. (My auto-ethnographical discoveries concerning "clandestine" performance revealed that a statement like "sexuality is impossible" cannot be found--not to say we should attempt it.) The individual is contextualized into a cultural serialism qua serialism that subsumes composition under a entity.

3. "clandestine" performance and Solieist difference

When we examine Solieist difference, we are confronted by a paradox: one can reject the all-too-textual concept of performance or, on the other hand, one can conclude that academe is capable of mere masturbation. But what does this really signify? It could be said that the stasis, or as some might say surrealist, Schenkerianist obligation, quotes measures 64-86 of Shaw's Partita, to a romanticist mindset, and again throughout mm. 222-249, 167-180, and hinted at in 63-88 (and foreshadowed in the compositions of Rousseau). But Solomon's essay on "clandestine" performance states that the goal of the participant is clear depiction. Ergo, the Conservatory's concluding of physicality analyses, better reiterates, realism. Many appropriations concerning super-, meta-, and neo-composition exist, each of which Girard reframes in turn [6].

"Music is intrinsically responsible for the musicologist," stresses Heidegger; by contrast, according to Ono[7] , it is not so much music that is intrinsically responsible for the musicologist, but instead the failure, and eventually the newness, of music. Yet how might Solieist difference, constrained by the cultural narrative, read, indeed conclude, diverse actors? As an example, Solie uses the term "realism" to denote the role of the listener as artist. However, though capitalist sexisms try to entrench Western culture, the contributions of gay studies challenge culture and overcome by enriching World culture, upholding popular music.

The composer has a choice: either reject Dell'Antonio's critique of "clandestine" performance and subsequently accept that society has undertones of real worth or, on the contrary, reject Abbate's analysis of "clandestine" performance and consequently be complicit in that expression comes from our worth-system. Thus Allen[8] implies that the works of Radiohead are not postmodern. The idea of Slim's[9] model of realism is the common ground between musical form and society. But Clemmens[10] states that we have to choose between realism and Solieist difference.

My prior publications about the futility, and ergo, the sensitivity, of clandestinist society suggest a sociology of identity in the McClaryian-theorizingist mode (in contrast to "scientific" composition). (The musicologist is manifested into a musical/sexual negotiation that merges politics with a totality.) The absurdity can be heard in measures 141-160 of Ueno's ...blood blossoms..., albeit in a self-supporting mode in measures 240-251 and inverted in 77-97. But must, or some can insist might, Barraque (imperceptably standing up to inter-tonic romantic theory) decouple, and even distort, "clandestine" performance (itself perhaps surprisingly seeking only to escape a bimusicalist "semiotic" all-too-cultural concept of context)? The response for Cage proceeds as follows:

(Eco's essay on open work implies that language is used to reinforce hierarchy, but only if history is roughly equivalent to scholarship.) Brett suggests the use of Wagnerist Gesamtkunstwerk to read performance. It could be said that my own thoughts concerning realism discovered that a statement like "the orchestra is part of the dialectic of art" cannot be uncovered. Music's deconstructing of sexuality vis-a-vis ambiguity, and insistence rather on transposing the sexuality vis-a-vis ambiguity, denies Solieist difference.

4. Cage resituated

The characteristic thesis of the works of Glass is a textual whole. The idea has precedent: In a larger sense, many proto-constructions relating to "clandestine" performance may be revealed, and each will be examined individually. Although status quos respell archaic, conservative musical form, LGBTQ persons attack musical form and foreground transgendered musical form, sustaining realism. (Fitzpatrick[11]) As an example, Wagner uses the term "triadic prolongation" to denote the difference between music and society. In a sense, the idea of Wissner's[12] monograph on realism is the role of the (ethno-)musicologist/musicker as critic-musician. Hence the example of "clandestine" performance prevalent in Glass's "Einstein on the Beach" is also evident in "Music with Changing Parts", though cursorily.

Though Derrida famously stated that society is disability, the nuanced ideas of Linklater[13] demonstrate that in a very real way, society is not disability, but it is instead the economy, and some would say the genius, of society that is disability. Why could truth entrench Solieist difference? If Solieist difference is true, we have to pick between "clandestine" performance and disability musicology. However, the observer has a dilemma: (a) reject A. B. Marx's critique of realism, or, ironically, (b) accept Wagner's analysis of realism and rightly reject that performance is created by notated music, but only if Solieist difference is to be believed; otherwise, Cheng's model of urbanist performance grounds itself in "post-romantic modernism", and thus fundamentally used in the service of cisgendered perceptions of composition. The form, or rather stasis, emerges yet stronger in mm. 123-141 of Beach's Mass throughout bars 237-244 and 263-272, and somewhat paradoxically throughout a few oeuvre of Ives.

In a larger sense, Solie's model of new organology holds that memory is capable of truth. (My auto-ethnographical publications concerning "clandestine" performance suggest a musicology of remorse in the McClaryian-canonist vein (the Bornist overtones of this statement are plain).) The object is restated into a sonorousist proto-anthropological theory that encompasses language within a paradox. The principal focus of Haggh's[14] analysis of realism is the collapse, and subsequent failure, of de-nationalism qua nationalist society. Composition's deconstructing of music affirms Solieist difference.

But if "scientific" ambiguity be true, we have to choose between "clandestine" performance and realism. Therefore Heidegger promotes the use of Solieist difference to read past elitism. Nevertheless for whom must realism (obviously trapped by the neo-romantic "clandestine" performance) negate globalization, itself perhaps usefully defined by a sexualist modernist narrative?

While outdated homophobias seek to reinforce straight culture, the contributions of gay studies rehear culture and succeed in bolstering queer culture, advancing the disabled. Heidegger uses the term "realism" to denote both self-appropriation and pre-self-appropriation. My auto-ethnographical discoveries concerning the mediation between society and music found that a statement like "the task of the analyst per se is mere masturbation" cannot exist--not to write we should promote them.

it is clear that the relationships among realism, "clandestine" performance, and Solieist difference--to say nothing of the textual conception of analysis, which particularly applies to quasicultural works--are evolving towards a more bimusicalist goal. Further study of Muhly's works, especially I Drink the Air Before Me, in the context of Adornoist dialectic and the participant's material canon will be the sky to progression.


1. Berger, J. ed. (1890) "clandestine" performance and realism. University of Illinois Press

2. Allen, Ludwig ed. (1984) Serialist/Common-practice: Realism and "clandestine" performance. Harvard University Press

3. Ronyak, E. (1985) Scholarship, culture, and sexuality: Realism in the works of Oliveros. University of California, Berkeley Press

4. Friedland, Michael (1979) Beethoven, modernism, and realism. University of Illinois Press

5. Planchart, T. ed./trans. (2013) The Analysis of Defining characteristic: "clandestine" performance in the works of Saariaho. Indiana University Press

6. Girard, Matthias ed./trans. (1993) "clandestine" performance in the music of Radiohead. Edward Mellyn Press

7. Ono, W. (2006) Realism against "clandestine" performance. W.W. Norton

8. Allen, Seda ed./trans. (1927) "clandestine" performance and realism. M.I.T. Press

9. Slim, M. C. Q. (1981) Deconstructing Straus: Realism, Adornoist dialectic, and modernism. Scarecrow Press

10. Clemmens, John ed./trans. (1898) Pigeonholing the Listening: Realism in the music of Glass. McGraw Hill

11. Fitzpatrick, K. ed. (1980) Realism in the works of Attinello. Tufts University Press

12. Wissner, Catherine (2016) Envoicing physicality/Analyzing ourselves: Realism after Beyonce. Brandeis University Press

13. Linklater, R. ed. (1945) Narratives of Paradigm: Realism in the music of Reich. Indiana University Press

14. Haggh, Rudolf (1879) Modernism, Muhly, and realism. University of Illinois Press

Automatic bad new musicology paper generator: based on the Postmodernist essay generator and the Dada engine.

 

In the further interest of self-parody, I am starting work on an Old Musicology random essay generator; please email me with ideas. All I know is that every paper will begin "On f. 3v, a new watermark ..." etc.